The Analytic Scholastic
Saturday, December 29, 2012
One More Reason Why Russellian Descriptivism is False
›
Russellian descriptivism about proper names can be summarized rather roughly in terms of the following four theses. For any object O, where ...
Sunday, September 16, 2012
Reply to William Lane Craig on Divine Simplicity
›
Dr. William Lane Craig has made a response to my previous post where I argued that his own view of divine sovereignty entails the truth o...
9 comments:
Sunday, September 9, 2012
William Lane Craig Responds
›
...to my post on divine simplicity, here .
5 comments:
Saturday, August 4, 2012
Minimal Divine Simplicity and the Trinity
›
Just a note: I will probably be laying kind of low for a while, since I am now moved in at my new school and taking summer courses. I will b...
Tuesday, July 31, 2012
Is Promise-Breaking Lying?
›
Eric brought this question up to me. I tend to think promise-breaking is lying. Here's the form a promise to someone takes: "I pro...
6 comments:
William Lane Craig on God and Analogy
›
William Lane Craig, as with most contemporary analytic philosophers of religion, objects to the classical Thomistic idea that God cannot be...
15 comments:
Friday, July 27, 2012
Is 'Existence' Univocal Because 'All' Is Univocal?
›
In this post , Bill Vallicella presents another argument by Peter van Inwagen for the univocity of existence and questions it (he posted and...
2 comments:
‹
›
Home
View web version